Read "Wizard's First Rule" by Terry Goodkind available from Rakuten Kobo. Sign up today and get $5 off your first purchase. Wizard's First Rule, the first novel by. Wizard's First Rule, the first novel by Terry Goodkind, was a phenomenon from the moment it was published by Tor Books in , selling more than Terry Goodkind Books Audio: Wizard's First Rule ebook free to download.
|Language:||English, Spanish, Japanese|
|ePub File Size:||22.68 MB|
|PDF File Size:||8.65 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Wizard's First Rule (Sword of Truth Book 1) to download this book the link Description Wizard's First Rule, the first novel by Terry Goodkind, was. The Sword of Truth, Boxed Set I: Wizard's First Rule, Blood of the Fold, Stone of . Free Download Book file Terry Goodkind The Omen Machine PDF at Editorial Reviews. From Library Journal. The protective barrier that separates Westland from its Download it once and read it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. $ Read with Our Free App; Audiobook Wizard's First Rule, the first novel by Terry Goodkind, was a phenomenon from the moment it was.
With an OverDrive account, you can save your favorite libraries for at-a-glance information about availability. Find out more about OverDrive accounts. Wizard's First Rule , the first novel by Terry Goodkind, was a phenomenon from the moment it was published by Tor Books in , selling more than , copies in North America alone. It still sells more than , copies a year and has gone on to bestsellerdom in the United Kingdom and in more than twenty foreign translations as well as audiobook form. It is now being developed as one of the most ambitious television miniseries of all time. Richard and Kahlan's story unfolds over ten more novels, collectively known as the Sword of Truth series, concluding with Confessor in Placing Goodkind in the elite club of 1 New York Times bestselling authors, the series has sold more than twenty million copies to date worldwide.
Friend Reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about Wizard's First Rule , please sign up. I have read the entire Wheel of Time and Malazan Book of the fallen but ended them with mixed feelings. Should I go for the Sword of Truth series? Oneeyed I have to agree with Avaminn. This series feels subpar compared to Jordan or Erikson's works.
So I very much doubt you'd like it. Goodkind is very …more I have to agree with Avaminn. Goodkind is very derivative of Tolkien, even more so than Jordan, but without any flair or talent.
I had a hard time even finishing the first book and it's kind of obsessive with me to finish every book I start Are they ever going to make a good adaption of the sword of truth series? Jessi I actually liked Legend of the Seeker and was sad when it ended. See all 15 questions about Wizard's First Rule….
Lists with This Book. Community Reviews. Showing Rating details. Sort order. May 13, J. It is always curious to see fantasy authors who don't consider themselves to be fantasy authors.
Terry Goodkind. The former landscape painter has told us how he isn't a fantasy author in every interview he's ever given: I'd like to address a broader audience. In so doing I've raised the standards. I have not only injected thought into a tired empty genre, but, more importantly, I've transcended it showing what more it can be. He doesn't seem to realize that the things he claims separate him from fantasy are fundamental parts of how modern fantasy works.
A novel that's fundamentally about character interactions with a magical setting? How droll. Goodkind doesn't reinventing the novel; he doesn't even reinvent the fantasy novel, he just twists the knobs to get a little more steam out of it. Michael Moorcock critiqued Tolkien as a false romantic, which is rather apt considering that his love story takes place almost entirely in absentia prompting Peter Jackson to infuse some extra loving with a hot, elven, psychic dream sequence.
Most fantasy authors rectify this by having the girl come along for the journey. Goodkind likes to keep the separation for much of the story as our hero tries to seek her out across a continent though she is often just in the next room! What a tragic coincidence! Actually, after the first time it's just an annoying and painfully artificial way to try to hold off the conclusion for another hundred pages.
It's a good thing Terry doesn't have to rely on magical or artificial means to keep his stories fresh! The rest of the time, the hero finds the girl and lovingly transfixes her on his mighty sword. No, really. I'm not sure why these authors always end up feeling as if they have to dump their sex fetish issues at this particular juncture: Maybe I should confide my fantasies in a book for mass publication". I cannot think of a single female character in the entire series who isn't either raped or threatened with rape.
If you want to give me an example of one, remember: I'm counting magical psychic blowjob rape as rape. I wish I never had the opportunity to qualify a statement with 'don't forget the psychic blowjob rape'.
bvifacts.info: Wizard's First Rule (Sword of Truth Book 1) eBook: Terry Goodkind: Kindle Store
I don't mind actual BDSM literature, but I'd rather have my own reaction to it than be told "isn't it totally dirty and wrong!? Goodkind's books are cookie-cutter genre fantasy, but the first few aren't that badly done, and if you like people narrowly missing one another, bondage, masochism, rape, and dragons, it might work for you, but the series dies on arrival part-way through, so prepare for disappointment.
If you are enjoying the series, you should probably avoid reading any of his interviews, as he rarely misses an opportunity to claim that he is superior to all other fantasy authors, and never compare him to Robert Jordan, because "If you notice a similarity, then you probably aren't old enough to read my books. Then again, I've never met an adherent of Ayn Rand who didn't consider themselves a brilliant and unique snowflake trapped in a world of people who 'just don't understand'.
The Randian philosophies are also laid on pretty thickly in his books, but at least he found a substitute grandmother figure to help him justify his Gorean sex-romp as 'high art'. All in all, he's just another guy who likes to hear himself talk. Despite what he says, nothing separates his work from the average modern fantasy author, and like them, his greatest failing is the complete lack of self-awareness that overwhelms his themes, plots, and characters.
My Fantasy Book Suggestions View all comments. Jul 24, Icarus rated it it was ok Shelves: Terry Goodkind is a grossly inept writer, with the writing ability of a somewhat intelligent seventh-grader, but he jumped into the wide-open fantasy field when there were hardly any good fantasy writers a state that hasn't completely changed, btw and he has the persistence to turn out page novels, and so he got published and now he's grandfathered in, because some people don't have better taste than to buy his novels.
Additionally, his early work is grotesquely derivative, mostly of Rober Terry Goodkind is a grossly inept writer, with the writing ability of a somewhat intelligent seventh-grader, but he jumped into the wide-open fantasy field when there were hardly any good fantasy writers a state that hasn't completely changed, btw and he has the persistence to turn out page novels, and so he got published and now he's grandfathered in, because some people don't have better taste than to buy his novels.
Additionally, his early work is grotesquely derivative, mostly of Robert Jordan as a matter of fact. His bad guys, particularly in this book, are such a mish-mash of evil that they became caricatures of evil, and are actually laughable. For instance, either Darken Rahl or his henchman, I don't remember which.
These guys were not just evil and out to despoil everything in sight and out for total power and in cahoots with the evil underworld spirits, one of them was also a child-molester to boot. I'm sure Goodkind would have called him a Nazi, had the concept fit into his milieu. And finally, after about four novels or so, Goodkind sacrifices story-telling on the altar of making a political point, and since then every book has been a thinly veiled objectivist, anti-religious and anti-altruism rant.
I don't care that he has a point of view, or that he occasionally slips it into his writing, but his evil characters have become now, not caricatures of evil, but mean-spirited caricatures of the philosophy he opposes. And so he has shown himself, through his writing, to be someone I would despise quite apart from it: He tortures the crap out of his writing in order to make it serve his convoluted agenda. Do yourself a favor and don't start this series. Especially if, like me, you have OCD tendencies and feel compelled to finish what you start.
And yes, I am jealous—-that a lousy writer like that can have page volume after page volume published, and I can't. Because, frankly, I think I'm better than he is. View all 89 comments. Nov 22, Katerina rated it it was amazing Shelves: There are books you read once, you enjoy them and never give them a second thought.
There are books you love and want to share this love with the entire world. And then there are books that are so precious to you that talking about them feels like sacrilege, like exposing your bare soul and instead you safeguard them like a treasure.
For me, Sword of Truth belongs to the latest category. The only reason I decided to write a This is the beginning.
The only reason I decided to write a proper review is because it's a series that readers either love or hate, and I wanted to show you that despite the negative reviews there is something worth reading here, a gem that not everyone can appreciate but the ones who do, they will never be the same again.
So, here's my bare soul. You have the gift. Use it. Use everything you have to fight. Don't give in. Don't let him rule you. If you are to die, die fighting with everything you have, everything you know. That is the way of a dragon. The tyrant of D'Hara is about to put together the pieces of an ancient puzzle that can either give him unlimited power to control the world of the living or destroy life itself.
The wizards have fallen, and the only person that stands a chance against him is the Seeker of Truth, the wielder of the Sword of Truth, a weapon forged with magic destined only for those that are deemed worthy. And that person is Richard Cypher.
With a grumpy wizard and a mysterious woman as his companions, he sets off an epic journey, a journey to unlock the secrets of magic and human nature, greed and love, and find his destiny. They will believe a lie because they want to believe it's true, or because they are afraid it might be true. He combines adventure with romance, magic, evil queens and dragons, sorcerers and wild tribes, past and present, death and life. His magic system is extremely well-written, his world-building solid and fascinating, his characters realistic.
When I read his books, I feel like he's talking to me , he unravels the multiple layers of my soul and when he puts them back together, his story is among them. It's a part of who I am. Because his writing contains deeper messages and wisdom about life and love that sank into my bones.
What makes Sword of Truth stand out, is that the enemy isn't a dark, inhuman lord who commands legions of nightmarish creatures.
No, the enemy is one man, a man who has given his soul to the darkness, whose goal is to eliminate resistance and free will. And because of his pervertion, this book is dark, mature, cruel and sometimes disturbing , and themes like rape, tortures and human sacrifices are also included.
But without the darkness, we would not appreciate the light. He is not a child, he is a man, a man brave and loyal and fair, a man who tried for years to tame his anger only to find out that his righteous fury will be the means to use the Sword of Truth and deliver justice, no matter how hard it is. He is kind and noble, he can forgive his enemies and fight for people he never met and above all, he is the smartest character I have ever met.
He is a hero. And so is Kahlan. She is a woman of power, strong and confident, dedicated to her mission and a nightmare to her enemies. But the price of her power is the isolation and fear she inspires to everyone but Richard. To say that they are my favorite couple of all time would be an understatement. I ship them in an I-would-walk-through-the-fiery-pits-of-hell-to-make-sure-you-end-up-together kind of way. Don't expect rainbows and pink clouds, there are forces that keep them apart but their love is steady as a rock.
In fact, I believe those two give the definition of the word love. It's about finding happiness for the one you love. They're more than friends, they live inside me. And for that I am eternally grateful. Instagram Twitter Facebook BookNest View all 56 comments.
I very much enjoyed this book! View all 45 comments. Aug 12, John Wiswell rated it did not like it Recommends it for: Hardcore fantasy readers, preferably young ones who read fast. Wizard's First Rule is a good example of why people think all post-Tolkien Fantasy is trash.
It bears one tenth of Tolkien's imagination, a smaller fraction of his brilliant study, and - oh look, swords! Cliche family drama, an angsty romance between tormented lovers, powerful characters who are so unjustly tortured - it's immature at best. At its best, it is a clunky and self-indulgently obtuse hero's journey. Then there's the hundred page BDSM tangent, where the hero goes through excruciating Wizard's First Rule is a good example of why people think all post-Tolkien Fantasy is trash.
Then there's the hundred page BDSM tangent, where the hero goes through excruciating pseudo-bondage games with his captor. This part borders on self-parody, because the outrageous subject matter is stretched out for so long that it becomes boring and we're just waiting for it to end, and we know it will, because this isn't an inventive story that's going to venture to brave new intellectual worlds.
The romance is similarly brutal, but on the weepy side rather than the sado-masochistic. There isn't even the hero-empowerment fun of Eragon to turn this into a fun immature adventure - it's too slow and anxious for that.
Instead it builds to a ludicrous climax and a plot twist that you wouldn't think anyone would pen after Star Wars came out. But this book would. View all 43 comments. Dec 12, seak rated it liked it Shelves: Richard and Kahlen's Relationship Timeline: Day One: It's only been three days? Well, that still seems sensible. Random Mord Sith comes in out of nowhere.
See Days Four through More Details: So, I didn't quite go into this with the best of intentions. I wanted to jump on the bandwagon since I felt like the only one not making fun of Goodkind. I can, however, say that I enjoyed Wizard's First Rule. Ten years ago, I would have loved it more than anything. Five years ago, I still would have really really liked it.
Today, I've realized I'm not quite the same reader I was before. I've always loved what many term the "traditional" fantasy. While I enjoyed Goodkind's twist on this traditional tale, it was still a bit much for me at times. Richard is the boy-who-would-be-insert-title and he's just too perfect. Okay, he's a wilderness guide, so he's good at tracking and woodsy stuff that's the technical term, believe me, I'm a woodsy guide. I can get behind that. But then he can fight and solve riddles and do rubik's cubes and everything.
Then, and I kinda feel like a tool talking about this since I don't really know all that much what I'm talking about, there's the lack of foreshadowing.
There's probably a better term that would qualify this, but we jump from one adventure to the next. There's the ultimate good versus bad tale going on, but to get to the end, there's so much padding with multiple adventures in between.
We have to go to the mud people so they can tell us stuff. Oops, the mud people can't tell us, we have to go to that mountain over there and it's such a dangerous mountain. Oops again, now we have to call a fairy by tapping our ankles twice while holding our breath, doing a somersault on a donkey and spelling the word Goodkind backward. I know Eddings' Belgariad does much the same thing, but that has a special place in my heart, whereas The Sword of Truth was just too late in my reading career.
Add to that the less than stellar feelings toward the later volumes in the series, you may not see me carrying on. I will say, the ending was pretty good and will actually be moving my 3 star rating up to a 3. Lucky duck. View all 62 comments. Jun 05, k. Okay everyone. Below is my review from when I tried to read Wizard's First Rule back in I was fresh out of college. You know, back when you thought your opinion mattered. While I didn't personally like the book and couldn't get into it, I really went for it in this review.
I now regret it. You don't really understand how difficult it is to write something good until you try and write a book yourself. It's taxing, time consuming, alienating. Sometimes you think you wrote something amazing, Okay everyone. Sometimes you think you wrote something amazing, and then someone will come around and tell you they'd rather lick their own dog's teeth than read what you wrote.
It's hurtful. I'm leaving my review up below because I think it's a good lesson. If you don't like something, cool, that's fine.
But you don't have to tear it down publicly. Better yet, why not point out the good you saw in it? There will be, inevitably, some person who shows up to point out all the bad. Nobody's worried that that person won't show up, so they now must shoulder the responsibility. I'm also leaving this review up so that I don't run from it.
This review has gotten a lot of likes here on Goodreads, and with each new like, I feel more and more guilty about it. Writing is hard. My hat's off to you, Mr. I apologize for my distasteful and mean review.
Thankfully, you have so many fans out there that love your book and will stand by it, even when little shits like me throw out a mean review. I really did try for this one, as I love my boyfriend very much who loves this book. I found the writing unbearable, as I would rather smell my dog's breath and lick his teeth than have to read words written by Terry Goodkind. That being said, I was interested in the story, but it was as if the guy did not have an editor.
I did love reading his acknowledgements page. Does that count? Also, just incase Terry Good and Kind is out there, I am very sorry too. I wasn't too keen on your book, and I'm sorry this attack on your book was personal to your writing style and abilities. I think you are a cool looking man - one of the best with a ponytail - and I am sure you are as your last name implies.
View all 27 comments. Aug 31, Dave rated it it was amazing Recommends it for: The sheer depth of Wizard's First Rule is simply amazing. His characters are unique and original, yet seem simple when you realize that they aren't perfect. Every chapter you read will cling you tighter to his series.
Of course, many will dislike Terry Goodkind's works, either because he establishes dead on ethics in an 'I'm right, your wrong' approach, or because of dissatisfaction with his writing style, but it would be a baseless altercation to state that he is a run-in-the-mill, and mediocre The sheer depth of Wizard's First Rule is simply amazing. Of course, many will dislike Terry Goodkind's works, either because he establishes dead on ethics in an 'I'm right, your wrong' approach, or because of dissatisfaction with his writing style, but it would be a baseless altercation to state that he is a run-in-the-mill, and mediocre author.
Terry Goodkind deserves nothing but praise for this extraordinary novel. View all 16 comments. Feb 05, Jen rated it did not like it Recommends it for: Dungeons and Dragons fans, sadists. I am adding this author to the list of people that I wouldn't want to have lunch with. After this review, I suspect he won't want to have lunch with me either.
Terry Goodkind eBooks
This book reads like a game of Dungeons and Dragons. It's a quest, a bit formulaic, and at times I could practically hear the narrator telling me to roll the ten-sided die to see what happens when we go down the left fork.
In this book, we have the hapless regular guy who through a great series of coincidences finds himself traveling to sa I am adding this author to the list of people that I wouldn't want to have lunch with.
In this book, we have the hapless regular guy who through a great series of coincidences finds himself traveling to save the world with the beautiful, mysterious woman formerly, the damsel in distress , the great and powerful wizard who is utterly disappointing and mostly serves as comic relief , and the hardened, streetwise soldier.
It almost feels like the author drew a map of his new fantastical world, decided to put the main character at one end, and the solution at the other, and then gave him a veritable obstacle course of classic problems on the way. He runs into underworld beasts, monsters, dragons, deluded armies, and betrayal which, consequently, the rest of us saw coming pages before he did.
To say this book is plot-driven would be an understatement. Sadly, though, even the pacing of that plot isn't good. But none of that has anything to do with why I wouldn't want to hang out with the author. I found the creations of his imagination really disturbing.
I could almost feel his delight in divining new and more horrible atrocities to detail as the story went on. Yes, the bad guy is very, very bad. But there was a definite sick, sadistic side to the story.
I just have to wonder what kind of person decides to spend something like eight chapters on very descriptive and imaginative torture of one character, when the great love that supposedly drives the story took a comparative flash to develop. He's great at devising innovative ways to cause pain and anguish, but terrible at imagining realistic human interaction. The dialogue, sadly, reflects that. When the author isn't describing pain or evil, a sitcom-like feeling prevails.
A paraphrased typical scene: If you love Dungeons and Dragons, or if you're someone who enjoys causing or experiencing pain, this book is for you. For me, not so much. I wonder if his other books get any better? View all 12 comments. Apr 09, Julio Genao rated it did not like it. View all 38 comments.
Terry Goodkind likes rape. A lot. I wouldn't be surprised to find out he's a Neo Nazi. Let's have a character who kills everyone who's brown colored and celebrate him! And villains that rape a lot! Rapedy rape rape rape, rape rape! There are entire webpages devoted to people talking about the worst passages of these horrible books. I suggest you do something better with your time, like scraping mildew.
It'll be more enjoyable. Fuck you, Terry Goodkind, and fuck your Nazi Randian viewpoints. Just die. View all 20 comments. Jan 28, Daniel Greene rated it did not like it. Originality is a bit of a gray area. It's hard to find what exactly constitutes paying homage versus stealing.
Get A Copy
Terry Goodkind has left that gray area, sprinted 6 miles down the road, dug up the bodies of fantasy authors who came before him, and took the coins from their pockets. View all 6 comments. I had no idea that that "The Legend of the Seeker" tv show was based on a book, so I was super excited about this!
The tv show is definitely loosely based on the books, though, and took its own direction. This story starts in a world split by magic boundaries that people can't cross. An evil guy is trying to find some magic boxes and bring about all this doom Anyways, the main character Richard lives in a peaceful little village w I had no idea that that "The Legend of the Seeker" tv show was based on a book, so I was super excited about this!
Anyways, the main character Richard lives in a peaceful little village where he's friends with an old guy who turns out to be a super powerful wizard. Richard randomly runs into a girl in the forest who's crossed the boundary and is being pursued by evil guys, so he steps in and is swept into his destiny of being A SEEKER. He seeks things It's basically what it sounds like. He even gets a sword that says "truth" on it. It's all so very epic. This story is pretty long so I won't even try to summarize stuff.
Richard and Kahlan go through the boundary, fight a lot of spirits and evil things, find a sorceress, find a princess I've decided I just do not like characters named Denna , find lots of threats, and But the writing was still good!
I could totally tell from the tone that it was written by a man over 20 years ago. And that's not a bad thing at all! Just funny that it's so noticeable.
Anyways, the Darken Rahl evil guy and his minions were a lot more fun in the tv show. Rape trigger warning btw and just a whole lot of creepy stuff.
And obviously Richard falls in love with Kahlan the girl he found in the forest , but she's definitely not some side character for him to rescue. She has a secret and a huge destiny herself, is totally strong on her own, aaaand But the main thing I appreciated was that Richard wasn't some chosen one.
He decides to be the Seeker. I did like this and will probably read the sequels eventually View all 8 comments. The gender ideologies underlying the novel's cosmology are just so profoundly disturbing that I couldn't enjoy what there was of the story -- not that I was likely to enjoy it anyway, since it featured large amounts of sexual torture of Our Hero.
It's really not any more tasteful when gender-reversed.
View all 14 comments. Nov 04, Ivan rated it liked it Shelves: To be honest I started this book with certain bias. Because statements like: I star To be honest I started this book with certain bias. I started his book hoping for ammunition against author. Well I have to say I didn't get it, Goodkind may be all of the above but he isn't a bad writer. No he's books don't transcend fantasy genre, but if we ignore author's delusion of grandeur we have decent heroic fantasy with a twist.
I had one big problem with it. Book tries to have serious themes in it but in book with noble heroes and evil, evil villains they often feel out of place. No matter what Goodkind claims he's book doesn't transcend fantasy genre but it's good enough and it might have been 4 stars if not for 30 page torture porn. I am not sensitive person but I would prefer if authors would leave their kinky fetishes out of their books.
View all 11 comments. Nov 23, Jason rated it did not like it Recommends it for: I was referred to Terry Goodkind as a better alternative to Robert Jordan. I feel betrayed and lied to. Or maybe it was some kind of joke. Goodkind's characters are simply not believeable, and this absolutely kills the book. The dialog is forced, and it feels as if no one ever proof read Goodkind's "masterpiece. View all 4 comments. Jan 24, Choko rated it really liked it Shelves: It is a linear story, no multiple POV's or constant action sequences, but engrossing nonetheless Recommend it to all Fantasy lovers, but I think those new to the genre would enjoy it most!
View all 7 comments. Mar 26, Suzanne rated it did not like it Recommends it for: Nobody with taste in fiction. Recommended to Suzanne by: Somebody who I will have a hard time forgiving. I can honestly say this is the worst piece of fiction I have ever encountered, in any genre.
It's hard to know where to start critiquing this book since I hated so very many things about it. First off, it is about four times too long. I'm all for an epic sized novel if the story can support it, but this one doesn't come close. The dialogue is, for the most part, trite and boring and the characters are all astoundingly two-dimensional and unauthentic.
They are all constantly doing things against I can honestly say this is the worst piece of fiction I have ever encountered, in any genre.
They are all constantly doing things against their described nature, and so many of their actions are inconsistent with what the characters know and how they would logically act. This is part of what makes the story read like a rough draft where the author is trying to get the plot down and needs to go back and do some serious polishing. The polishing never occurred. The characters all make the most idiotic mistakes about things that a kindergartner would have been able to reason out.
This is just bad writing. The author could have achieved the same results in far more plausible ways, while at the same time giving the characters some consistency, intelligence, forethought, and reasoning ability. Like many other negative reviewers, I am astounded by the sheer quantity of trite plot devices.
He really pushes Jungian literary theories of collective conscious and archetypes to the limit. The real show stopper on the trite-fest that is this book is the "Luke, I am your father"-esque moment at the end. The plot line in the book was not well planned out, if it even was planned out; I would not be the least bit surprised to hear that the author just winged it.
Think of the plot of a good book as an enjoyable road trip. The route will turn, taking you past several interesting vistas, while still generally heading towards the destination. The plot for Wizard's First Rule stops at every turn out and explores every cul de sac along the way, and frequently stops, goes back a ways, and then drives over the same stretch a second time.
It is chock full of sequences that do nothing to advance the story or aid character development. I don't have a problem with the content of this message, just that it was so blatant and heavy handed. The other oft-repeated and preachy moral was that of relative morality, which I did have an issue with. The main character, through the preaching of his trusted wizard friend, keeps having deep thoughts about how there is no good or evil from the viewpoint of those making a choice or performing an action.
Like we are supposed to believe that, from the viewpoint of the child-molesting serial killer character, he considers his actions good and morally acceptable. Boo, Mr. Goodkind, boo. Speaking of the child-molesting serial killer, he was only one of several deeply disturbing elements of the book.
Not only do we have evil characters doing horribly naughty things, we, as readers, are treated to graphic descriptions of said naughty things.
We get to hear about the molester's love of buggery, the dominatrices passion for torture, and how the pointlessly-vegetarian-turned-cannibal evil ruler first brainwashed his child victim before pouring molten lead down his throat, mutilated his body, and ate parts of it. Oh, and a bunch of rape. This was just pages of a horribly written waste of time.
If I didn't enjoy meeting with my book-club which is discussing this in a few weeks , I wouldn't have continued past the first chapter.
I deeply resent the time this book took to read, as I have so many more worthy things I could have been reading in its stead. View all 9 comments. A young woodsman is chosen as the Seeker, a long lost position of power given to a warrior of ultimate good in distant lands.
Now, he must go to those distant lands to face the Evil controlling it, as well as to deal with issues of truth. Along his journey, his position is tested as his love for his new lady love. But, it attracted a lot of fantasy readers, who tend to be more thinkers, and it holds a great deal of promise.
This story dealt with archetypes and LEVEL ONE readers; it was above average of most fantasy novels; used archetypes and the mythical Hero's Quest to appeal; good characters and focus on context; less on plot and surprises.
Richard was very noble and easy to anger when faced with lies or difficult appeal; I think this resonated with many readers who are tired of the BS in our society and desire simpler times; characters are interesting but only on a simple level; if you want gray characters and profound thinking and interactions, you won't get it in this series. Spent a lot of time building up the characters. This is much more a story of context and characters than of plot or fast action.
A great deal of time is spent playing off the character relationships, describing the landscape and people and monsters and also in laying out the History. And actually, the History is pretty interesting as are the monsters. There were several character revelations which weren't surprising in this novel since it was so character focused. A few surprises and such, too. Richard Cypher is a good and moral character.
Perhaps a bit too much. He is the typical innocent yet good youth from mythology who sets out on a mission where the odds seem insurmountable. As described above, the monsters were orchestrated nicely into the ecology. The dragon character was fresh enough and the description of the travels along the wilderness were interesting.
The interplay between Richard and Kahlan kept my interest. Enough tug and pull and conflict. Zedd was introduced naked which was interesting and new. He wasn't stereotypical either and had enough of his own lines to make him stand out more. Also, he wasn't some big buffed dude. I liked the way he manipulated in a good sense towards other people to achieve some better end, but still felt bad over it.
The viewpoint of using a child and changing the word usage was good, too. The villain wasn't different but interesting enough. The sexual debauchery made them even worse. No doubt this was to create moral outrage. Have to say Richard is no warrior in the first novel but that's okay.
He seemed to get out of jams enough times. Not clever. More noble and good that he gets others to help him as in the case of the Dragon. Interesting how Richard went through pain whenever he took a human life and had to deal with the results.
Magic, in other words, has its limitations. Great details of the world and History; in regards to the lands being divided into three areas; the red fruit that is poisonous in the magical lands; the illusions used to fool the hero and heroine; the limitation of magic users; the confessor development and History; the Seekers and info.
Pay attention to some of the names: Those are the main ones which come to mind but I'm sure there are others. Also interesting were the little phrases that permeated the storyline, giving it texture. For instance, Zedd the high wizard had the best ones: Gifting of the Kindle edition at the Kindle MatchBook price is not available. Learn more about Kindle MatchBook.
Page 1 of 1 Start Over Page 1 of 1. Previous page. Terry Goodkind. Next page. Kindle Cloud Reader Read instantly in your browser.
Customers who bought this item also bought. Page 1 of 1 Start over Page 1 of 1. Stone of Tears Sword of Truth Book 2. Blood of the Fold Sword of Truth Book 3. Temple of the Winds Sword of Truth Book 4. Soul of the Fire Sword of Truth Book 5. Faith of the Fallen: A Sword of Truth Novel. Editorial Reviews From Library Journal The protective barrier that separates Westland from its neighbors to the east is about to fall, letting loose a monstrous evil upon the world.
Only the combined efforts of a young man dedicated to finding the truth, an enigmatic woman intent on concealing her past, and a crusty old hermit resigned to his inevitable destiny can prevent the opening of the three boxes of Orden-an event with the potential to destroy existence itself. The inclusion of graphic scenes of sado-eroticism, though integral to the story, may deter purchase by some libraries. Nevertheless, this first novel offers an intriguing variant on the standard fantasy quest.
The richly detailed world and complex characters will appeal to mature fantasy aficionados. Copyright Reed Business Information, Inc. In a classic fantasy world, young Richard Cypher must go on a perilous quest with the Sword of Truth in order to deal with evils that have a contemporary degree of ambiguity about them. On the way, he acquires the normal collection of wizards, dragons, and human companions as well as an equivalent roster of enemies.
Both the characters and their world come to life, and Goodkind's ambitious juxtaposition of modern ambiguities and the classical fantasy setting works more often than not. Although a fairly self-contained story, the book has something of the flavor of the first volume of a saga; neither Goodkind nor his publisher will receive too many complaints if a sequel is in the works.
Hardly an aspirant to Tolkien's mantle, Goodkind certainly seems, at any rate, to be working on being mentioned in the same breath as Robert Jordan. Roland Green. See all Editorial Reviews. Product details File Size: RosettaBooks September 14, Publication Date: September 14, Sold by: English ASIN: Enabled X-Ray: Share your thoughts with other customers.
Write a customer review. Customer images. See all customer images. Read reviews that mention terry goodkind sword of truth darken rahl robert jordan wheel of time richard and kahlan lord of the rings ever read truth series richard cypher george rr martin legend of the seeker stone of tears writing style highly recommend well written character development rest of the series looking forward books in the series.
Top Reviews Most recent Top Reviews. There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later. Kindle Edition Verified Purchase. Let me start off by saying that Goodkind is not the greatest writer ever. That being said, the Sword of Truth series is still my personal favorite.
There is violence. A lot of violence. It gets pretty graphic. There's also some dark, sexual stuff that happens, too, but not as explicit.
If you're into fanfiction, think "lemon" territory--it's mentioned, and it happens, but he doesn't go into nitty gritty details. The characters are what keeps me coming back, but they are admittedly a little unbelievable; The protagonist Richard is a little too "perfect" and "god like", coupled with abilities that seem to do exactly what he needs when he needs it.
His love interest Kahlan seems to be more of a plot device than a character; she has her B. The two of them spend an awful lot of time forced apart throughout the series gets a little repetitive the further you go, tbh.
Zedd is my personal favorite and probably the best written overall, though he is in every sense the typical grandfatherly character that's there to provide words of wisdom and moral support. The series hits its high point at Faith of the Fallen; all of the characters get a chance to really shine, particularly Richard. Beyond that the series falls into the muck of war fiction, and before that Goodkind still seems to be struggling to flesh out his world and characters.
I particularly like the philosophical edge the series has. Most people complain about this, but I find it to be one of the more intriguing and interesting things about the novels.
These are mostly revealed as "Wizard's Rules",while some are brought up in discussions between characters. It gives the stories some substance where they otherwise may have fallen short. In any case, the series is definitely worth a try if you're into medieval fantasy, and can enjoy a book at face value.
If you're worried about the graphic nature of it, I might suggest starting with Stone of Tears, as Goodkind does a decent job of filling you in on what happened in Wizard's First Rule without being so shockingly graphic from what I can recall, WFR is definitely the worst in this aspect. I picked up Stone of Tears first, and went back to read WFR after the fact, which may be why I didn't get scared away by the graphic events in the first book.
This is my favorite series out of the thousands of books I have read. Some quotes I like, trying to avoid spoilers: In their selfishness and greed, they see free people as their oppressors. They wish to have a leader who will cut the taller plants so the sun will reach them. They think no plant should be allowed to grow taller than the shortest, and in that way give light to all.
They would rather be provided a guiding light, regardless of the fuel, than light a candle themselves. This book, and others in the series are packed with insights into society and culture. All while maintaining a gripping sense of suspense and anticipation. I am constantly tempted to skip ahead to see what happens next in various storylines, but the current storyline is always just as captivating. Terry Goodkind is truly a master of his art. Like many I wanted something similar while I wait for Martin to finally finish his next book.
I read several books and his dark material series trying to fill the void. I came upon the debt of bones in a collection of short fantasy stories and it reeled me in.
I saw that Goodkind was getting a lot of positive reviews but after reading his critics I thought twice about starting the series. It really is crazy how well his books are rated but so many people like me were almost influenced by the strong criticism against him.
Anyway after I started I had a really hard time putting the book down. I think reading Martin actually made this book better for me. Martin is so ruthless you never know who is safe and I think that kept me on the edge of my seat while reading this book. Also I really bought in to the anguish and despair of the characters and I thought that really made the book great too.
Another draw for me are the different kinds of magics. Their limitations and how they compliment each other are really interesting. There are some pretty dark parts, but if you are fine with Martin you'll be fine with Goodkind.
There are a lot of coincidences and maybe luck, but this is fantasy so to me that stuff is ok:
- MR BEAUTIFUL RK LILLEY EPUB FREE DOWNLOAD
- ENGINEERING THERMODYNAMICS EBOOK DOWNLOAD
- DEBBIE MACOMBER EPUB FREE DOWNLOAD
- GREENBERG NEUROSURGERY EBOOK FREE DOWNLOAD
- DOWNLOAD FROM EBOOK.BIKE
- HARRY POTTER RUSSIAN EBOOK DOWNLOAD
- QTP DESCRIPTIVE PROGRAMMING UNPLUGGED EBOOK FREE DOWNLOAD
- DER NASSE FISCH EBOOK DOWNLOAD